This morning I was reflecting on some recent discussions
around Bernd Wannenwetsch’s Political
Worship, and came across Geoff Holssclaw’s post: “Church or Family”: http://geoffreyholsclaw.net/church-or-family/,
where he describes the unsuspecting visitors at his church walk in expecting a “church,”
but find a “family” instead.
They hit on some similar themes. Wannenwetsch explores the
relationship between Household (Oikos) and Politics (Polis). His primary
contention is that the Household of God (born into through Baptism= the church)
lives life in the Spirit and is the true picture of what the Kingdom looks
like, or what is breaking into the Polis and what the Polis needs to hear
proclaimed.
It is interesting to think of the Household then as the ideal. So long we have thought of the Polis as the ideal. We import ideas of the culture into the Household--Ideas of identity, self-image, of how reality operates, of the hierarchy of importance, of the hierarchy of people or acts, etc. We interpret our worship gatherings through the lens of our world. We sit down on a Sunday morning expecting the same things as we expect on Tuesday at work, on Saturday at the movies, or Thursday for lunch. And then, we judge our experiences through the lenses of our Tuesdays, Saturdays, and Thursdays. (Tuesday) How effective is this “business” we call church? What do the numbers tell us? How can we be more efficient? (Saturday) That worship leader was a little off-key there. I really liked that Pastor’s sermon. How can we make this service more appealing to more people? (Thursday) This service really needs to fit into my hour time slot. I can just sit back and consume this service; I shouldn’t have to work at it. Can I just write you a check instead? Could you just give me three life-application points?
It is interesting to think of the Household then as the ideal. So long we have thought of the Polis as the ideal. We import ideas of the culture into the Household--Ideas of identity, self-image, of how reality operates, of the hierarchy of importance, of the hierarchy of people or acts, etc. We interpret our worship gatherings through the lens of our world. We sit down on a Sunday morning expecting the same things as we expect on Tuesday at work, on Saturday at the movies, or Thursday for lunch. And then, we judge our experiences through the lenses of our Tuesdays, Saturdays, and Thursdays. (Tuesday) How effective is this “business” we call church? What do the numbers tell us? How can we be more efficient? (Saturday) That worship leader was a little off-key there. I really liked that Pastor’s sermon. How can we make this service more appealing to more people? (Thursday) This service really needs to fit into my hour time slot. I can just sit back and consume this service; I shouldn’t have to work at it. Can I just write you a check instead? Could you just give me three life-application points?
Instead, Wannenwetsch is proposing that the liturgy of the
Sunday morning gathering is the kingdom of God. This is where we are
proclaiming, in word and ACTION, the kingdom come—through the power of the Holy
Spirit. The kingdom is a proclamation to the Polis. It is a picture of the
world as it should and will be. It displays
the hope and faith of the restoration of the world not merely through words,
but by the actions of its community members—the way they treat one another, the
way they order their lives and participation, the way the church understands
her role in the world.
So, here’s where Geoff’s post comes in (I knew you were
starting to wonder…). The supposition made by Holsclaw is that the Sunday
morning gathering not only factually (for his congregation) feels like a
family, but I would contend that it should
feel that way. It should not only feel out of place from the ebb and flow of “the
world” (as I know we’ve all been taught to interpret that passage), it should
start turning our lenses inside out. The worship gathering allows us to form
our understanding of the world-- our
vision for what “reality” really is, the priority of the polis, the value of
humanity and their hierarchy, and the hope for the restoration of the world.
In our gathered communities of worship, we get to live the
story we long to live every waking moment. For the story of--
the world, the kingdom, each other, and how things should be—is hidden as a
political proclamation to the world every Sunday morning (or Saturday night, or
Sunday afternoon—whatever your ecclesial fancy). The spirit-inspired liturgy is
reality where the polis fails. And that is the relationship between the two.
They are not separate spheres. They are not opposed. One proclaims fullness to
the other which is yet missing the pieces.
So the disconnect of people’s lives is a stark contrast to
the familiarity of the Spirit-filled people of God. The discord of broken
relationships is harmonized in the breaking of bread with one another in Christ’s
name. And the hopelessness of a worn-out, cracked and damaged world, seemingly
circling the drain is shattered with the creator God’s passionate embrace to
restore and lavishly love creation—and claiming a people for God’s name. For
this is not the story where God sits back and says, “impress me,” but sends of
God’s self, Jesus, into the world to reclaim what was trampled by death—by trampling
death itself.
My our Tuesdays, Thursdays, Saturdays, and for that matter,
our Wednesdays, Sundays, Mondays, and Fridays anamnesisly-remember the story of
the God who call us.